Readability Checker Widget

Embed a readability checker in your writing or plain-language guide. Readers paste English text and get six standard readability scores with what they mean, plus the word, sentence and syllable counts behind them.

SEO & Content Tool Runs in your browser Free · no ads

Customize your widget

Theme
Auto follows the visitor's light/dark setting.
Style
Attribution on your page
Optional and entirely your choice. The exact line is shown in the code below; it links to the tool with rel="nofollow".
More options
Starting values
Leave blank to use the widget's defaults. Visitors can still change every value.

Live preview

Exactly what your visitors will see

Embed code

<iframe src="https://a2z.tools/embed/w/readability-checker" title="Readability Checker by A2Z Tools" width="100%" height="930" style="border:0;width:100%" loading="lazy" allow="clipboard-write"></iframe>

A plain iframe. Works everywhere, including site builders that strip scripts. Adjust height if your content needs more room.

Works with

How it works

Every score comes from a published formula applied to counts of words, sentences, syllables, letters and complex words, using the same text engine as the A2Z Readability Score Analyzer. Flesch Reading Ease runs from about 0 (very hard) to 100 (very easy); the grade-level formulas estimate the US school grade needed to follow the text. Syllables are counted with an English heuristic, so scores that depend on them are estimates; SMOG was designed for samples of 30 sentences or more and is marked unreliable below that. The formulas were built for English and are not meaningful for other languages.

Method

  • Flesch Reading Ease = 206.835 - 1.015 (words / sentences) - 84.6 (syllables / words)
  • Flesch-Kincaid Grade = 0.39 (words / sentences) + 11.8 (syllables / words) - 15.59
  • Gunning Fog = 0.4 [(words / sentences) + 100 (complex words / words)]
  • SMOG = 1.0430 sqrt(polysyllables x 30 / sentences) + 3.1291
  • Coleman-Liau = 0.0588 L - 0.296 S - 15.8 (L letters, S sentences per 100 words)
  • ARI = 4.71 (characters / words) + 0.5 (words / sentences) - 21.43
  • Complex/polysyllabic word = 3 or more estimated syllables (Fog also excludes hyphenated compounds, capitalised words mid-sentence and syllables added by -es, -ed or -ing); scores shown to one decimal

Limitations

  • Syllables are counted by an English spelling heuristic, not a dictionary, so words such as "business" or "naive" can be off by one syllable.
  • Formulas see only word and sentence length; they cannot judge jargon, logic, layout or whether the reader knows the topic.
  • Bullet lists, headings without full stops and code make sentence counts unreliable; score continuous prose only.
  • No formula for other languages (such as Amstad for German or Fernandez Huerta for Spanish) is included.

Where publishers use it

  • Plain-language guides for government and healthcare writers
  • Content-marketing blogs aiming at a general audience
  • Teachers matching texts to students' reading levels
  • UX-writing style guides for interface and help text

Questions

What is a good Flesch Reading Ease score?

60-70 is plain English that most adults read easily. Many public-sector guides aim for 60 or higher; academic writing often scores below 30.

Why do the grade levels disagree?

Each formula weighs different things - syllables, letters or long words - so they differ by a grade or two. Look at the overall picture.

Does it work for other languages?

No. The formulas and the syllable counter are designed for English.

How much text do I need?

At least 100 words for stable results, and 30 sentences for SMOG.

Sources

  1. Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32(3), 221-233 - American Psychological Association . Reading Ease formula
  2. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L. & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75 - Naval Technical Training Command (DTIC ADA006655) . Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
  3. Gunning, R. (1952). The Technique of Clear Writing - McGraw-Hill (Internet Archive copy) . Fog Index
  4. McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading - a new readability formula. Journal of Reading 12(8), 639-646 - ERIC EJ004016 . SMOG and its 30-sentence sample
  5. Coleman, M. & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology 60(2), 283-284 - American Psychological Association . Coleman-Liau Index
  6. Smith, E. A. & Senter, R. J. (1967). Automated Readability Index. AMRL-TR-66-220 - Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories (DTIC AD0667273) . ARI

Cite or recommend this tool

If you reference this tool in an article, course or documentation, these formats are ready to copy. They are optional - nothing is added to your site unless you paste it.

A2Z Tools Readability Checker
https://a2z.tools/readability-score-analyzer

Preview